Tool · Initial screening

The property is irregular. Which route is yours?

Owners who find the property is not in their name know the problem, not the way out. The ways out differ, with different statutes: usucapião, compulsory adjudication, probate, registry rectification, building registration, Reurb, or deed and registration. See which is most likely.

⚠ Likely route, not an opinionThe result points to the likely route from what you answered. It never states that you hold a right or that the property is yours — only the registry record and the documents settle that.
Runs in your browserNothing you answer leaves your device: no server call, no sign-up, no e-mail or phone.
Two hypotheses when neededWhere more than one reading fits, we show both and explain what separates them, not choose for you.
1 · The property and the registry

The matrícula is the property's record at the Real Estate Registry — not a tax bill or contract.

Is the property urban or rural?
Municipal zoning decides this, not appearance.
Does the property have its own registry record?
Is it in an irregular subdivision, favela, informal settlement or collective occupation?
Signs: lots sold without registration, unofficial streets, neighbours without records.
Is the land public — federal, state or municipal?
2 · How the property came to you
Which document marks your acquisition?
3 · Possession
How long has the possession been yours?
You may add the time of whoever passed it to you (Civil Code, art. 1,243).
What kind of possession is it?
Do you live in the property?
Do you own another property, urban or rural?
4 · What the record already shows

Shown only for registered owners.

The route above still has to be
checked against the record.

An up-to-date registry certificate confirms or defeats any diagnosis built from answers alone. Send your result by WhatsApp for an initial screening; the fee proposal comes in writing after the documents are reviewed.

Send my diagnosis on WhatsApp
How the diagnosis decides

The rule, the article and the review date.

The rule in one sentence. The diagnosis first checks the blockers — public land and possession without intent to own. It then asks whether the property sits in an informal urban settlement, whether the registered owner has died, and whether a contract exists. Only then does it use time of possession, which picks the category of usucapião, never asserts a right. Where two routes remain, both appear.

The blockers come from the Constitution: art. 183, § 3, and art. 191, sole paragraph, bar usucapião of public property. And possession by someone paying rent or occupying by permission does not count: arts. 1,238 to 1,242 of the Civil Code require possession held as one's own.

The periods the tool uses

Extraordinary: fifteen years, regardless of title or good faith, cut to ten with habitual dwelling or productive works — art. 1,238 and sole paragraph. Ordinary: ten years, with just title and good faith — art. 1,242. Special urban: five years, up to 250 m², dwelling and no other property — Constitution, art. 183; Civil Code, art. 1,240; Law 10,257/2001, art. 9. Special rural: five years, up to fifty hectares made productive, with dwelling — Constitution, art. 191; Civil Code, art. 1,239. Family: two years over an urban property of up to 250 m² shared with a former spouse who abandoned the home — art. 1,240-A (Law 12,424/2011). Tacking a predecessor's possession is art. 1,243.

When the route is not usucapião

Where a contract exists and the seller refuses, the route is compulsory adjudication: art. 1,418 of the Civil Code allows demanding the deed and, on refusal, asking the court to adjudicate; art. 216-B of Law 6,015/73, added by Law 14,382/2022, allows doing it at the property registry, with a fifteen-day notice, certificates, transfer tax and a lawyer; the order of the two routes follows the reason the deed is missing. Where the owner has died, probate comes first (Civil Code, art. 1,784; Code of Civil Procedure, arts. 610 and 611). In an informal urban settlement the route is Reurb (Law 13,465/2017). For registered owners the fix is registral: rectification under arts. 212 and 213, building registration under art. 167, II, 4.

Legal basis: Constitution, arts. 20, 26, 183 and 191 · Civil Code, arts. 108, 1,238–1,245, 1,417, 1,418 and 1,784 · Law 6,015/73, arts. 167, 212, 213, 216-A and 216-B · Law 10,257/2001 · Law 13,465/2017 · Code of Civil Procedure, arts. 610 and 611 · Precedent 239 of the Superior Court of Justice · Last reviewed: 16 August 2026
Questions and answers

Regularizing a property in Brazil.

What is the difference between usucapião and compulsory adjudication?

Adjudication starts from a contract: art. 1,418 of the Civil Code lets the buyer demand the definitive deed and, on refusal, ask the court to adjudicate. Usucapião starts from time of possession and needs no contract (arts. 1,238 to 1,244). Adjudication fits where the seller exists and the chain of title is intact; usucapião, where the seller vanished or the property never had a registry record.

My purchase contract was never registered. Does that bar compulsory adjudication?

No. Precedent 239 of the Superior Court of Justice states that the right to compulsory adjudication is not conditional on registering the purchase commitment at the property registry. Registration under art. 1,417 of the Civil Code creates a right in rem against third parties, but its absence does not remove the buyer's claim to demand the deed.

Do I need a lawyer to regularize a property in Brazil?

It depends on the route. Law 6,015/73 expressly requires the applicant to be represented by a lawyer in out-of-court recognition of usucapião (art. 216-A) and in out-of-court compulsory adjudication (art. 216-B, § 1). Reurb is an administrative procedure of the municipality, and art. 14, II, of Law 13,465/2017 gives standing to the beneficiaries themselves, directly.

How much does it cost to regularize a property?

It varies with the route. There are third-party expenses — notarial minutes, survey plan and memorial signed by a licensed professional, certificates, registry fees, transfer tax and court costs — and legal fees, set case by case and presented in writing after document review.

Do you assist clients outside São Paulo or Brazil?

The statutes used here are federal and apply across Brazil, so the routing works in any state. The firm is on Avenida Paulista and serves clients elsewhere remotely, by videoconference and with digital documents; in-person acts at the registry or before the local court may involve corresponding counsel. Clients abroad are assisted in English, through a power of attorney.

Letícia Marques
Legal review

Letícia Marques

Founding partner of Falchet e Marques (OAB/SP 428.777). Head of the real estate practice — titling, adverse possession, contracts and litigation — with postgraduate degrees in Real Estate Law (PUC/SP) and Succession Law (PUC-Campinas); a specialist in probate and estate administration.

About Letícia Property regularization in São Paulo