Property title regularization: how to bring the documentation up to date, from the occupancy permit (habite-se) to REURB, and how much does it cost?

Many people discover that their property "is not in order" at the worst possible moment: when it is time to sell, to finance or to handle the probate. The house was expanded and the area in the property record was never corrected; the townhouse has an extra floor that was never recorded; the lot was bought in a subdivision that was never registered; the small farm changed hands several times through an unregistered purchase agreement (contrato de gaveta). In all of these cases, there is a real, occupied and valuable property — but documentation that does not keep up with reality.

That gap between what exists in the world and what is written at the Real Estate Registry Office is what regularization resolves. And it is not a bureaucratic luxury: it is what separates an asset that circulates (can be sold, given as security, financed, partitioned) from an asset that stays locked, worth less than it could be and generating risk for whoever occupies it. The cost of not regularizing rarely shows up on an invoice — it shows up in the discount the buyer demands, in the financing the bank denies and in the probate that gets stuck.

In this guide, you will understand what it means to regularize a property, what the most common irregularities are and the right instrument for each one: the construction recording and the occupancy permit (habite-se), the boundary/area rectification, the REURB (with its Reurb-S and Reurb-E categories) and the georeferencing of rural property. At the end, an example with numbers, the most common and costly mistakes, and a practical checklist. The goal is simple: that you know where to start and what to expect from each path.

What does it mean, in practice, to regularize a property?

To regularize a property is to make its legal situation — what appears in the property record at the Real Estate Registry — coincide with its actual situation, both physical and in terms of use. The property record is the property's "identity certificate": it describes where it is located, how large it is, what is built on it and who the owner is. When any of those data points is wrong, incomplete or missing, the property is irregular — even if no one disputes that it is yours.

It is important to understand that "irregular" is not synonymous with "illegal" nor with "not being the owner." In most cases, the occupant has every right over the asset; what is missing is the documentary alignment. For that reason, regularization tends to be less about "acquiring" the property and more about describing it correctly in the registry — although there are situations in which regularization first requires acquiring ownership (by adverse possession (usucapião), for example).

The purpose of this is direct: a regularized property is worth more, sells better, can be financed and given as security, and is transferred to heirs without obstacles. An irregular property does the opposite — it drives away buyers and banks, reduces the price and turns probate into a saga. Regularizing is, therefore, an asset-management decision, not merely a registry matter.

The most frequent irregularities fall into a few families: unrecorded construction (the building exists, but the property record describes only the land); discrepancy in area or boundaries (the property record does not match what was measured); subdivision or partition without registration (the lot was sold, but the subdivision was never formalized); informal occupation of urban settlements (without title of ownership); and, in the countryside, lack of georeferencing and registration. Each of these families has its own instrument — and that is why the diagnosis is the most important stage.

How does the construction recording work (and why does the occupancy permit matter so much)?

This is, by far, the most common irregularity — and the most underestimated. When a plot of land is registered and a house, a townhouse or a building is then built on it, the construction does not "enter" the property record automatically. A specific act is needed: the construction recording, which causes the building to officially appear in the property's registration.

Until that is done, the property record describes only the land — and, from a registry standpoint, it is as if the construction did not exist. The consequences are concrete: the bank refuses to finance the purchase of a building that is not recorded (because the security, the mortgage or the fiduciary lien applies to what is registered); the buyer who looks into the property record notices the flaw and demands a discount; and the declared value of the property becomes outdated, with effects on the IPTU (municipal property tax), on insurance and on probate itself.

The construction recording is usually supported by the occupancy permit (habite-se) (also called the "certificate of completion" or "certificate of occupancy"), a document issued by the municipal authority attesting that the works were completed in accordance with the approved project and are fit for use. For single-family constructions, the Public Registries Law provides a simplified recording route (art. 247-A). In São Paulo, this means first going through the municipal sphere — approval of the project, regularization of the works, issuance of the occupancy permit (habite-se) — and then taking the act to the registry.

It is worth noting a recent change that made life easier for those regularizing: the legislation moved toward waiving the requirement of a clearance certificate for tax debts in certain construction recordings, reducing a historic bottleneck. Even so, the central point remains: without an occupancy permit (habite-se) and without the recording, the construction is not regular — and the sale, the financing and the inheritance are compromised.

What is boundary/area rectification and when does it resolve the discrepancy in the property record?

It is very common for the area or boundaries described in the property record to not correspond to what the property actually has. The property record says 250 m², the survey shows 280 m²; the old memorial describes the boundaries imprecisely ("up to the water channel," "up to the neighbor's fence"), and no one knows for sure where the land ends. For this there is the registry rectification, provided for in articles 212 and 213 of the Public Registries Law (Law 6.015/1973, as worded by Law 10.931/2004).

Rectification can be done in two ways. The administrative route, at the Real Estate Registry Office itself, is the rule today: the interested party submits a survey plan and descriptive memorial signed by a qualified professional (engineer or surveyor, with an ART at CREA, or architect, with an RRT at CAU) and, generally, with the consent of the adjoining owners (the neighbors whose boundaries are touched). If an adjoining owner does not sign, they are notified to respond; if there is a reasoned challenge, a period is opened for agreement and, without a solution, the registrar refers the case to the competent judge.

There is a limit that must be made clear, because it is where many people get confused: rectification serves to bring the registry into line with reality within the boundaries of the title — not to add area from outside. In other words, it corrects a measurement error "within the walls"; it is not a shortcut to adverse possession (usucapião). If the aim is to incorporate a piece of the neighbor's land, of the street or of an area that was never in your title, the path is not to rectify, but to acquire ownership of that strip — the subject of our page on adverse possession. Confusing the two leads to the request being denied.

Law 14.382/2022, which created the Electronic System of Public Registries (SERP), also touched on this procedure, improving rules on pre-notation and on the use of titles during the analysis of the rectification. In practice, a well-prepared rectification — with the correct technical survey and the adjoining owners in agreement — is one of the most efficient paths to regularization.

What is REURB and who can use it?

When the irregularity is not that of an isolated property, but of an entire settlement — a subdivision that was never registered, a village formed over decades, a cluster of houses without documentation —, the instrument is REURB: Urban Land Regularization (Regularização Fundiária Urbana), governed by Law 13.465/2017 and regulated by Decree 9.310/2018.

REURB is defined as the set of legal, urban-planning, environmental and social measures intended to incorporate informal urban settlements into the planning of the city and to grant title to their occupants — that is, to give them a registered title of ownership. It is a procedure conducted by the municipal public authority, which reviews the request, approves the regularization project and, at the end, issues the Land Regularization Certificate (CRF).

The final step takes place at the Real Estate Registry Office: once the CRF is registered together with the approved project, a property record is opened for each regularized property unit, and the occupants receive their real rights. The phases of the procedure are defined by law (art. 28): application, administrative processing (with statements from the holders of rights and the adjoining owners), preparation of the project, remediation, decision of the authority and, then, the CRF and the registration.

REURB may be requested (art. 14) not only by public entities, but also by the beneficiaries themselves (individually or collectively, including through residents' associations), the owners, subdividers and developers, the Public Defender's Office and the Public Prosecutor's Office. The law also brings its own instruments, such as land legitimation and legitimation of possession (which may be converted into ownership after five years), urban demarcation and the recognition of the real right of overlying construction (direito real de laje). There is also the so-called Unnamed Reurb (Reurb Inominada) (art. 69), for tracts of land subdivided for urban purposes before December 19, 1979 that were never registered.

A relevant tax point: when ownership is acquired through land legitimation, it is an original form of acquisition — the same nature as adverse possession (usucapião) — which excludes the levy of ITBI on that act. It is one more reason why the correct categorization of the regularization has a direct effect on the wallet.

Reurb-S and Reurb-E: what is the difference that changes the bill?

Law 13.465/2017 divides REURB into two categories (art. 13), and the difference between them determines, above all, who pays the bill:

• Reurb-S (of Social Interest): applies to informal urban settlements occupied predominantly by low-income population, so declared by an act of the municipal Executive. In this category, the registration acts are exempt from costs and registry fees for the beneficiary — the social nature of the regularization is recognized through the exemption.

• Reurb-E (of Specific Interest): applies to the remaining cases, in which the population does not qualify as low-income. Here, the costs of regularization and registration are borne by the interested parties, and the acquisition of the real right may depend on payment, including when the area is public.

It is essential to understand that the category is not a free choice of the resident. Whoever classifies the settlement as of social or specific interest is the Municipality, based on socioeconomic criteria. This classification defines the applicable exemptions, the urban-planning relaxations and the costs — therefore, before starting, it is worth confirming which category the case falls into, because that changes the budget and the path.

And the subdivision? How to regularize lots and land subdivision

Buying a lot in a subdivision that was never registered is one of the most frequent origins of an irregular property. Urban land subdivision — dividing a tract of land into lots, with streets and infrastructure — is governed by Law 6.766/1979, which requires the approval of the project by the municipal authority and the registration of the subdivision at the Real Estate Registry Office. Only after that registration does each lot acquire its own property record. Without it, the buyer has a contract, but not an individualized property in the registry — and cannot finance, give as security or transfer it securely.

When the subdivision is old and was never registered, there are specific paths. For tracts of land subdivided for urban purposes before December 19, 1979, implemented and integrated into the city, Law 13.465/2017 provides the Unnamed Reurb (Reurb Inominada) (art. 69), which regularizes the registry situation of the subdivision. For more recent and irregular subdivisions, one usually resorts to REURB proper, conducted by the Municipality.

Law 13.465/2017 also created, by amending Law 6.766/1979, the figure of the condominium of lots — in which autonomous lots coexist with common areas —, which facilitated the regularization and registration of horizontal developments. The purpose of this is direct: a lot is, in fact, a marketable property only when the subdivision that originated it is registered.

How to regularize a rural property (and why georeferencing is mandatory)?

Rural property has an additional layer of requirements. The main one is georeferencing, created by Law 10.267/2001 and regulated by Decree 4.449/2002. To georeference is to describe the property by precise geodesic coordinates, with a survey plan and descriptive memorial signed by a qualified professional and certified before INCRA — today, through the SIGEF system (Land Management System), which verifies that the property does not overlap with another already registered.

Georeferencing is required to subdivide, parcel, merge or transfer the rural property, and the certification is recorded in the property record. Without it, the rural property cannot be divided or transferred regularly — which locks up sales, partitions and probate in the countryside, just as the lack of recording locks up urban property.

Beyond the registry dimension, rural property involves the cadastral and the environmental dimensions. In registration, there is the CCIR (Rural Property Registration Certificate, with INCRA) and the tax registration with the Federal Revenue (ITR). In environmental terms, there is the CAR (Rural Environmental Registry), required by the Forest Code, in which the permanent preservation areas and the legal reserve are declared. Regularizing a rural property, therefore, means coordinating three fronts at the same time — and it is frequent for one to block another if done out of order.

And when the problem is that I am not even the owner in the registry?

There are cases in which regularization is not just "setting straight the paperwork" of a property that is already yours, but acquiring ownership from someone who has occupied it for years without title. It is the classic situation of the old unregistered purchase agreement (contrato de gaveta), of peaceful and prolonged possession, of the property whose property record is in the name of a person already deceased or a dissolved company. In these cases, the path usually goes through adverse possession (usucapião) — including out-of-court adverse possession, carried out directly at a registry, which we address in detail on our dedicated page.

The difference is conceptual and practical: to regularize presupposes, as a rule, that ownership is already yours and only needs documenting; to acquire by adverse possession (usucapião) is to acquire ownership through possession, when the registry still points to another holder. In many real-life regularizations, the two are combined: ownership is acquired first (adverse possession), then the documentation is set straight (recording, rectification). Hence the importance of starting with the diagnosis — skipping that stage is what makes so many people knock on the wrong door and lose months.

A related path is compulsory adjudication for those who bought (with a contract and full payment) but never received the final deed — today also possible through the out-of-court route. Knowing how to distinguish adverse possession, compulsory adjudication and mere rectification is what determines the success (and the cost) of regularization.

How to avoid buying an irregular property?

Regularizing costs time and money — and the best deal is usually not to buy a problem. Before closing the acquisition of any property, a few verification precautions prevent inheriting someone else's irregularity:

• Up-to-date property record certificate: read what it describes and check whether the building is recorded, whether the area matches reality and who the owner is — cross-referencing with the certificates of encumbrances and of lawsuits.

• Occupancy permit (habite-se) and approved project: confirm, with the municipal authority, that the construction is regular and was completed in accordance with the approved project.

• Registered subdivision: if it is a lot, verify whether the subdivision was approved and registered and whether the lot has its own property record.

• Rural property: check georeferencing (SIGEF/INCRA), CCIR and CAR before signing.

• Sellers' certificates: to rule out the risk of fraud against creditors or fraud against enforcement that could reach the property after the purchase.

The purpose of this is simple to explain: the cheapest time to discover an irregularity is before signing the contract — not afterward, when the problem has already become yours. A prior document review is cheap insurance against an expensive loss.

How much does it cost and how long does it take to regularize a property?

There is no single figure, because "regularization" covers very different situations. But it is possible to give an order of magnitude for the cost components that usually appear:

• Technical services: topographic survey, survey plan and descriptive memorial (engineer, architect or surveyor), with an ART/RRT. It is one of the largest items, especially in rectification and georeferencing.

• Municipal fees: project approval, regularization of the works and issuance of the occupancy permit (habite-se), with the municipal authority.

• Registry fees: costs of the recording, the rectification or the registration, calculated on the value of the property (in Reurb-S, exempt for the beneficiary).

• Taxes, where applicable: ITBI in transactions involving transfer; nothing to collect when regularization merely corrects the property record or takes place through original acquisition.

• Attorney's fees: for the diagnosis and the conduct of the procedure.

As for the timeline, the rule of the size of the problem applies: a construction recording with the occupancy permit (habite-se) ready can be completed in weeks; a consensual boundary/area rectification usually takes a few months; and a REURB, because it involves a project, municipal review and collective registration, frequently takes from one to several years. The greatest accelerator is the quality of the diagnosis and of the initial documentation: starting right avoids the succession of requirements (the registry's "requirement notes") that is the main cause of delay.

A concrete example: the Andrade family's townhouse, in Vila Mariana

To make everything concrete, imagine a typical São Paulo case (an illustrative example, with round numbers). The Andrade family has a townhouse in Vila Mariana. The property record describes only the 180 m² plot and an old single-story house; except that, over the years, the house was demolished and rebuilt as a two-story townhouse, with 220 m² of built area, and the land, when measured, turned out to be 195 m² — not the 180 m² in the registry.

When they decide to sell for R$ 1.2 million, the problem appears in the buyer's bank review: the construction is not recorded and the area diverges. The financing is denied, the buyer pulls back, and the only proposal left is from a cash investor, offering R$ 980 thousand "because of the paperwork" — a discount of about R$ 220 thousand.

The regularization path is clear, and in the right order: (1) regularize the works with the municipal authority and obtain the occupancy permit (habite-se) for the townhouse; (2) record the construction in the property record; (3) rectify the area from 180 m² to 195 m², with a survey plan and memorial signed by an engineer (ART) and the consent of the adjoining owners. Add to this the cost of the procedure — let us say, by way of illustration, something between R$ 25 thousand and R$ 40 thousand across technical service, fees, registry fees and attorney's fees, and a few months' timeline.

The result: with the property record reflecting a 220 m² townhouse on a 195 m² plot, the property becomes financeable again, the universe of buyers widens, and the sale becomes viable at market value. The investment in regularization pays for itself many times over — not by "magic," but because a regularized property simply is worth what it should be worth. It was the lack of regularization, not the market, that was costing the family R$ 220 thousand.

Most common (and costly) mistakes in property regularization

In practice, the same mistakes recur and cost dearly:

• Leaving regularization for the time of sale or probate. That is when the problem becomes urgent — and urgency costs a discount. Regularizing calmly, beforehand, is always cheaper.

• Confusing rectification with adverse possession (usucapião). Trying to "annex" area outside the title through rectification leads to denial. Area from outside requires acquiring ownership, not correcting the registry.

• Building and never recording. The works exist, they do increase the value of the property, but they do not appear in the property record — and, for the bank and the buyer, what is not in the registry does not count.

• Buying a lot in an unregistered subdivision relying only on the contract. Without the registration of the subdivision, the lot has no property record of its own, and subsequent regularization can be long and expensive.

• Ignoring georeferencing in the countryside. Without it, the rural property cannot be divided or transferred — and the discovery usually comes, again, at the worst moment.

• Starting the wrong procedure. Starting a REURB when the case was one of simple rectification (or vice versa) wastes months. The initial diagnosis is what avoids this waste.

• Underestimating the consent of the adjoining owners. In rectifications, the neighbors' agreement speeds everything up; the lack of it, poorly handled, turns an administrative procedure into court litigation.

Checklist: where to start regularizing your property

• Obtain the property's up-to-date property record certificate and read what it actually describes (land, construction, area, boundaries, owner).

• Compare the property record with reality: is the construction recorded? Does the area match? Do the boundaries check out? Is there a registered subdivision?

• Gather the documents for the works: approved project, occupancy permit (habite-se) (or what is missing to obtain it) and survey plans.

• For an area discrepancy, hire a topographic survey and identify the adjoining owners who will need to consent.

• If the property is rural, check georeferencing (SIGEF/INCRA), CCIR and CAR.

• If the occupation is informal or the settlement has no registration, check the possibility of REURB with the municipal authority and the applicable category (S or E).

• Check whether ownership really is yours in the registry — if it is not, assess adverse possession (usucapião) or compulsory adjudication before regularizing the documentation.

• Carry out the legal diagnosis with a Real Estate Law attorney before starting any procedure, in order to choose the right path and the right order of acts.

Frequently asked questions about property title regularization

What does it mean to regularize a property?

It means making the physical and legal reality of the property match what is stated in the property record (matrícula) at the Real Estate Registry Office. In practice, this can involve several fronts: recording a building that exists but does not appear in the property record (with the occupancy permit, habite-se), correcting the area or boundaries that are wrong (rectification), regularizing a subdivision or an occupation through REURB, or carrying out the georeferencing of a rural property. A regularized property is one that can be sold, financed, given as security and transferred to heirs without surprises. Regularization is, at bottom, about turning de facto possession into secure ownership on paper.

Why do I need to record the building in the property record?

Because, without that recording, the property record describes only the land — as far as the registry is concerned, it is as if the house or building did not exist. This creates three concrete problems: the bank will not finance the purchase of a building that is not registered; the cautious buyer turns the deal down or asks for a discount; and, in probate, the property is transferred with incomplete documentation, which delays everything. The construction recording (generally supported by the occupancy permit, habite-se, and the closure of the works with the municipal authority) makes the building “appear” in the property record and increases the value of the property. It is one of the first steps of regularization and tends also to be the most overlooked.

What is the boundary/area rectification of a property?

It is the procedure that corrects the description of the property in the property record when the registered area, measurements or boundaries do not correspond to reality — for example, the property record says 250 m² and the land is 280 m². The correction can be made administratively, at the Real Estate Registry Office itself, with a survey plan and descriptive memorial signed by a qualified professional (with an ART or RRT) and, as a rule, by the adjoining owners (art. 213 of the Public Registries Law). It is important to understand a limit: rectification serves to bring the registry into line with reality within the boundaries of the title — it is not a shortcut to “annex” a neighbor's or the street's land, which would require adverse possession (usucapião).

What is REURB?

REURB is the acronym for Urban Land Regularization (Regularização Fundiária Urbana), governed by Law 13.465/2017 and regulated by Decree 9.310/2018. It is the set of legal, urban-planning, environmental and social measures that make it possible to regularize informal urban settlements — clandestine subdivisions, long-standing occupations, housing complexes without documentation — and to grant title of ownership to their occupants. The procedure is conducted by the Municipality, which at the end issues the Land Regularization Certificate (CRF); this certificate is taken to the Real Estate Registry Office, which opens a property record for each regularized unit. REURB was created precisely to resolve, at scale, the informality that affects millions of properties in Brazil.

What is the difference between Reurb-S and Reurb-E?

Law 13.465/2017 provides for two categories (art. 13). Reurb-S (of social interest) applies to settlements occupied predominantly by low-income population, so declared by an act of the municipal Executive; in it, the registration acts are exempt from costs and registry fees for the beneficiary. Reurb-E (of specific interest) applies to the remaining cases, in which the costs of registration and regularization are borne by the interested parties. The classification is not a free choice of the resident: it depends on the categorization made by the Municipality. In practice, the category determines who foots the bill and which relaxations apply.

How do I regularize a rural property?

Rural property has its own requirement: georeferencing, created by Law 10.267/2001 and regulated by Decree 4.449/2002. It consists of describing the property by precise geodesic coordinates, with a survey plan and memorial signed by a qualified professional, certified before INCRA (today through the SIGEF system). Georeferencing is required to subdivide, parcel, merge or transfer the rural property, and the certification is recorded in the property record. In addition, rural property usually requires the CCIR (registration with INCRA) and the CAR (Rural Environmental Registry, linked to the Forest Code). Regularizing a rural property, therefore, involves the registry, cadastral and environmental dimensions at the same time.

Can I sell a property that is not regularized?

It can be difficult, risky and cheaper than it should be worth. Without the building recorded and with an outdated property record, the bank normally will not finance it, which reduces the universe of buyers to those who pay in cash. The attentive buyer notices the irregularity in the property record certificate and demands a discount or walks away. And, even if the sale goes through, it may pass the problem (and the liability) forward, generating litigation later. Regularizing before selling usually pays off: a regularized property sells faster, at a better price and with much less risk of the deal stalling during the document review.

Does property regularization pay ITBI?

It depends on the instrument. When regularization merely corrects the property record (construction recording, boundary/area rectification), there is no transfer of ownership and, therefore, no triggering event for ITBI (municipal property transfer tax). When regularization takes place through REURB's land legitimation, the acquisition is considered an original form of ownership — the same logic as adverse possession (usucapião) — which excludes ITBI. In cases of Reurb-E on public land with payment to the public authority, or of a purchase made in order to regularize, there may be taxation depending on the transaction. Because each path has a distinct tax effect, it is worth confirming the categorization before starting, so as not to pay undue tax nor fail to collect what is due.

How long does it take to regularize a property?

It varies greatly depending on the type of irregularity. A construction recording with the occupancy permit (habite-se) in order can be resolved in a few weeks at the registry. A consensual boundary/area rectification, with the agreement of the adjoining owners, usually takes a few months; if there is a challenge and the case goes to a judge, it takes longer. A REURB, on the other hand, because it involves a project, municipal review and collective registration, frequently takes from one to several years, depending on the complexity of the settlement and the structure of the municipal authority. The best way to shorten the timeline is to start with the right diagnosis and complete documentation, avoiding the succession of registry requirements.

Do I need a lawyer to regularize a property in São Paulo?

Technically, some acts can be initiated directly at the registry or the municipal authority. But property regularization combines registry, urban-planning, tax and, sometimes, succession law — and the wrong path is costly in time and money. In São Paulo, where municipal land use and zoning rules coexist with requirements of the Treasury Department and of the registries of the various jurisdictions, a Real Estate Law attorney carries out the diagnosis (which irregularity exists and which instrument resolves it), gathers the correct documentation, liaises with the engineer or surveyor and conducts the procedure through to an updated property record. This reduces repeated requirements, lost deadlines and the risk of starting the wrong procedure.

What is the difference between regularizing and acquiring a property by adverse possession?

They are different things, although they sometimes intersect. Regularizing is, as a rule, setting straight the documentation of a property whose ownership is already yours (recording a building, correcting the area, registering a subdivision). Adverse possession (usucapião) is acquiring ownership through prolonged possession when you are not yet the owner in the registry — for example, you have occupied a property for many years, but the property record is in someone else's name. In some cases regularization necessarily goes through adverse possession (including the out-of-court route, carried out at a registry) before setting the documentation straight. That is why the first step is the diagnosis: finding out whether what is missing is to correct the title or to acquire ownership.

Regularizing beforehand is cheaper (and safer) than rushing later

At bottom, property regularization solves a problem of alignment: making the registry tell the same story as reality. As long as that story does not match, the property is worth less than it could be, does not circulate freely and carries a risk that usually appears at the most inopportune moment — the sale, the financing, the inheritance.

The good news is that, for almost every irregularity, there is a path — administrative, at a registry, and increasingly digital, thanks to the modernization brought by Law 14.382/2022. The bad news is that choosing the wrong path, or starting it out of order, turns a solution of months into a saga of years. That is why the value lies less in “doing” and more in doing it right, in the right sequence.

At Falchet e Marques Sociedade de Advogados, a firm in São Paulo (Av. Paulista), we work on property title regularization on all its fronts — construction recording and occupancy permit (habite-se), boundary/area rectification, REURB, georeferencing of rural properties, as well as adverse possession (usucapião) and compulsory adjudication when the case requires acquiring ownership before documenting it. We carry out the diagnosis, gather the correct documentation, coordinate with the technical professional and conduct the procedure through to an updated property record.

Talk to our team on WhatsApp: +55 11 95901-1854 — and find out which is the right path to regularize your property.